Proposal Prep Guide

Purpose Of This Guide

The purpose of this guide is to assist faculty, administrators and staff in the preparation of successful grant proposals.

Guide Contents

Attachments

  1. Detailed Budget Information and Procedures
  2. Copyright Policy
  3. Conflict of Interest Policy
  4. Disclosure of Invention
  5. Faculty Grant Incentive Policy
  6. Human Subjects Research and IRB Forms
  7. Military Research at the University of Detroit Mercy
  8. Patent Policy
  9. Principle Investigator Status Policy
  10. Scientific/Scholarly Misconduct
  11. Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet
  12. Sponsored Research Registration Information
  13. University of Detroit Mercy Internal Summary Form (.pdf)

Overview

For assistance with the preparation of proposals: in planning for enhanced sponsored projects and research activity; and in the budget review process in order to assess the projects' short and long-term fiscal impacts on the University; contact the Academic Affairs Office: 993-1584.The information that follows has been prepared with the individual grant writer in mind.

Locating Funding Sources

Crafting a competitive proposal for funding requires that one maintains a delicate balance. On the one hand the project at the heart of the proposal must be inherently "fundable." As the researcher you must specify goals that will impress your peers as worthwhile and even original and must demonstrate that you have developed a reasonable plan of how you will achieve those goals.On the other hand, though, a specific focus or slant to your project may derive in part from your early determination that you are writing for a specific funding organization with known priorities and preferences. It is never too early, therefore, to begin to consider what agencies might be interested in your work.To assist you in this process, the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration (OSPRA) maintains extensive information about external funding sources:
  • with the advent of the World Wide Web much of this information is now contained on the OSPRA Web Site. Our office encourages you to make this the first place you check for information, it is available to you 24 hours per day, 365 days per year from any computer located anywhere in the world. Our URL is http//:www.udmercy.edu/academicaffairs/ospra/. The site contains information on:

  • the OSPRA stocks published guidelines and application packages for a great many federal and non-federal programs;

  • it also subscribes to the major directories and handbooks of philanthropy and research support which also contain a wealth of information on the larger national and local foundations.
The simplest means for receiving information regarding funding opportunities that match your research interests is to electronically register with the appropriate service. A list of these services is provided on the OSPRA web site at: http://www.udmercy.edu/academicaffairs/ospra/notify/.Although the OSPRA is located on the McNichols Campus, the Director of this office maintains a presence on all three campuses and will gladly consult with faculty members at their convenience in their own offices or laboratories.

Approaching Funding Sources

As we noted before, the process of locating a potential sponsor for your project determines in part how you will develop and present the proposal itself. One major reason for this is that external funding organizations can be classed into three broad categories with quite different profiles: federal government agencies; agencies of state and local government; and private organizations such as foundations and corporations.

Federal Agencies

A large number of federal agencies and departments sponsor research and training grant programs. The interests of these agencies vary greatly from year to year as federal budget emphases change.

Normally, a federal agency is considered either a general support agency or a mission-oriented agency. A general support agency funds basic and applied research that contributes to the body of knowledge in a general subject field. For example, the stated purpose of the NIH is "to conduct and support biomedical research to improve the health of the nation." Other federal agencies that define their purpose in such general terms include the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH), and the National Institute of Justice (NIJ).

The process of reviewing proposals in such general support agencies will typically involve panels of the proposal writers' peers. These reviewers are not agency staff members but university or private researchers in the field. They assess the proposals' scientific merits and send their recommendations to an agency officer or to some higher body for final disposition. In either case, though, proposals must be recommended by the review panel or they will not be considered. Thus, any proposal to a general support agency must be written first and foremost for the proposer's peers.

By contrast, mission-oriented agencies fund only work which directly furthers their specific missions as dictated primarily by Congressional mandates. Such agencies include the Departments of Defense (DOD) and Energy (DOE) and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

The review process in a mission agency normally differs from that in a general support agency in that peer review, where it is used at all, is advisory only. Individual program officers formulate research programs each year and fund research directly related to those programs. In many instances, funded projects on university campuses are expected to complement ongoing research in the agency's own laboratories.

Well in advance of submitting a proposal to any federal agency, but particularly before submitting to a mission-oriented agency, you should contact the program officer by letter, telephone, agency visit, or preliminary proposal. (The OSPRA will gladly assist you in making this contact.) In doing so, you gain the opportunity to benefit from the program officer's review of, and comments on, your project; in addition, you introduce yourself and your work to him or her so that the proposal itself will be read in that specific (and, we hope, favorable) context.

State and Local Agencies

Both state and local government agencies also support research and training. To do so, they may utilize federal "pass-through" funds, funds from their own agency budgets, or a mixture of the two.

Pass-through funds (referred to in some cases as "block grants") are federal monies distributed to a state or local government to support specific area programs. Organizations such as the Michigan Council for the Humanities are funded in this way and operate much like federal programs at a regional level: they issue specific guideline publications, announce program deadlines, and follow formal peer review procedures.

Projects funded solely from state or local funds are often handled less formally. Rather than developing detailed programs, many agencies simply identify immediate needs, then look for individuals to address those needs. Thus, these projects often grow directly out of informal conversations between university faculty and agency staff rather than any formal proposal solicitation.

In either case, however, a formal proposal will eventually need to be submitted. It will include, at the very least, a statement of the work to be performed and a budget for the project. This proposal must be approved by the appropriate University officers before it is submitted to the agency (see University of Detroit Mercy Internal Summary Form (.pdf)) and will later form the basis from which a formal agreement can be negotiated and executed with the agency.

Private Organizations

Some non-governmental organizations, such as the American Heart Association, fund projects in areas related to their established purpose in much the same way as federal agencies do. However, the funding interests of foundations and corporations, the two major sources of private-sector funds, are not always so clearly defined. In addition, foundations frequently find themselves under a variety of other constraints (for example, geographical or denominational) that affect how they may spend their funds. As a result, even the strongest proposal submitted to such an organization may, nevertheless, not meet that particular foundation's funding profile.

Before submitting a proposal to a private foundation or a corporation, therefore, it is especially important to "research" that source thoroughly to determine what its funding interests are. The Foundation Center's National Guide to Foundation Funding in Higher Education and other directories available in the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration will provide the necessary information. Entries typically list financial data, purposes and activities of the foundation, types of support, limitations on support, and application information.

Preliminary contact, too, is even more important when applying to a foundation or corporation than it is when approaching a government agency. Frequently, staffers will expect to meet with you several times to discuss your ideas and to determine exactly how well they fit the organization's interests before your project will be seriously considered. The precise form of initial contact the organization prefers (letter, visit, preliminary proposal) is generally indicated in the reference sources mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

As with applications to federal agencies, University policy requires that the Director of Sponsored Research Administration authorize all proposals submitted to private foundations. In addition, however, foundation solicitations must also be reviewed by the University Relations Office. Thus, before any such agency is contacted, whether formally or informally, you should work with the OSPRA staff to secure the necessary approvals.

The Preliminary Proposal

The importance of contacting a potential funding source before submitting the formal proposal has already been stressed. If made in written form, this initial contact is often referred to as a preliminary proposal. In a preliminary proposal, you generally summarize in two to five pages your long- and short-term goals; how you will conduct your project; and why this project is important within your discipline and in a wider context. You may also be asked to include an estimate of anticipated project costs.

Such a preliminary proposal simply forms a basis for continued discussion; indeed, you should make it quite clear that this document commits neither you nor the University to any specifics. However, precisely because preliminary proposals do often represent the starting-point for negotiating actual funding, you should notify the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration when you plan to submit a preliminary proposal so that budget figures can be checked.

Preparing Proposals

When you are ready to submit a formal proposal to a funding agency, the OSPRA staff can provide assistance with each step of the proposal process: we can obtain agency guidelines and application forms; we can provide draft "boilerplate" sections of the text for you; we can help edit early drafts; we can advise you whenever budgetary questions arise (the Grants Administrator in the Controller's Office will, of course, also gladly assist you in budget preparation); and we will see to it that your proposal is correctly processed through the University.Components of a Typical Proposal
  • The Proposal Cover Page

    The cover page and other forms supplied by a funding agency allow you to present your project in a standardized manner so that it can be easily compared with other proposals. We have included sample cover sheets for NEH, NIH and NSF proposals in an appendix to this Guide to illustrate the kind of information that typical cover sheets contain.

    As with all bureaucratic documents, the formats of agency cover pages change constantly. To ensure that you have the very latest edition, check with the OSPRA before preparing the final draft of your proposal.

    The facts and figures that you will need to fill out a cover page accurately are contained on the Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet in an appendix of this Guide.

  • The Table of Contents

    Many larger funding agencies provide you with a preprinted Table of Contents form. Even if the agency you are applying to does not prescribe one, and certainly if your proposal is longer than half a dozen pages, you should consider including a table of contents listing the different sections that the package contains. This will give reviewers, who must consider large numbers of proposals under great time pressure, ready access to the parts of your proposal they are most interested in.

  • The Proposal Abstract

    The proposal abstract (or project summary) condenses the proposal narrative, briefly describing your project, its background, its significance, and the methods you plan to use. It will create the first impression of your work that reviewers receive, so it needs to be especially well written. Some agencies also use key information contained in the abstract to assign the proposal to the appropriate review panel. Thus, although your abstract will precede the narrative sections of your proposal once the package is fully assembled, many experienced grant writers prefer to compose it last.

  • The Project Description

    In their own guidelines, funding organizations frequently specify what information you should include in the narrative portion of your proposal. The NIH, for example, asks that you organize the narrative into the following sections: "Specific Aims; Background and Significance; Preliminary Studies/Progress; Research Design and Methods." They also prescribe the order in which other appended information, such as literature citations, should be presented (PHS Form 398, rev. 4/98).

    Other agencies may be less rigid in their requirements. Nevertheless, the broad categories of information that all funding sources seek in the project narrative are much the same, and may be summarized as constituting responses to the following basic questions about your project: Why is this work important? What have you already done? What do you plan to do next? How do you plan to do it?

    Why is this work important? Place your particular project in perspective. Document the need for this work by demonstrating an awareness of related research in your field and beyond. (Bear in mind the type of agency you are applying to and the level of expertise that you can anticipate among the reviewers.)

    What have you already done? Include the results of any preliminary studies and related work that you have done in this research area. Indicate how the proposed work will extend, complement, corroborate or refine earlier findings.

    What do you plan to do next? Explain what you expect to accomplish with your research. Describe the more immediate goals of your project clearly and realistically.

    How do you plan to do it? Describe the methods you plan to use. Be specific in outlining your procedures, bearing in mind once again the technical expertise of the reviewers you expect to be judging your application. If possible, include a timetable that maps the progress you anticipate making on your project, month by month or year by year.

    Some agencies, particularly smaller foundations, may ask that you include in your narrative some information about your department and its facilities, your college, and even the University itself. The OSPRA will be able to assist you in gathering this type of information.

  • Personnel

    A current curriculum vitae (C.V.) should be attached to the proposal for each professional staff member and each consultant included on the project. In a separate personnel statement you should identify the contribution that each individual will make and emphasize her or his qualifications and experience in areas relating to those project responsibilities.

  • Current and Pending Support

    Federal agencies in particular ask that you list both active grant and contract support that you and other staff members involved in the project already hold and any proposals you may have submitted elsewhere in recent months. Providing this information also affords you an opportunity to demonstrate your level of research activity and the personal commitment you have made to scholarly projects.

  • Facilities

    In a facilities statement, a researcher explains why his or her institution represents an advantageous location for pursuing that particular project. Physical scientists naturally focus on items such as laboratory space, technical equipment and support services. However, even for social scientists, humanists and those in the Fine Arts, issues such as the University of Detroit Mercy's geographical location, its urban setting and its tradition of concern for social justice and values may furnish useful raw material for this part of your proposal.

  • The Proposal Budget

    The budget contains projections of the amounts of money you will need in various areas if you are to be able to complete your project. These projections are directly determined by the detailed statements you made about your goals and methods in the narrative portion of the proposal. It is best, therefore, to approach the Grants Administrator in the Controller's Office for help with your budget only after you have drafted the project description.

    In general, though, a budget is constructed as follows:

    Direct Costs are those that can be directly and uniquely identified with your project. These costs might include:

    Personnel. List each person who will work on the project by name or job type and indicate the proportion of his or her time that person will devote to the project. By using each individual's current salary rate and allowing for estimated salary increases, determine the salary figure to include in your budget. (For time that a University of Detroit Mercy employee devotes to a funded project while under contract to the University, she or he receives only her or his standard salary. If the agency pays for such a staff member on a project, it does so by simply reimbursing the University for a portion of that salary. The employee does not receive any increase in his or her paycheck. If you or a member of your project staff is a nine-month employee, you can, of course, receive additional compensation during the summer months).

    Fringe Benefits. For each dollar paid in salaries or wages to an employee, the University incurs associated costs for fringe benefits. These include F.I.C.A., workmen's compensation, unemployment compensation, retirement, and life and health insurance. When a part of a researcher's salary is covered by requested funding, the funding agency must normally agree to pay the appropriate portion of that individual's fringe benefits (see the UDM Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet for the current Fringe Benefit Rate).

    Equipment. List each piece of permanent equipment, not already available to you, that you will need to complete the project. Be as specific as possible in your description including manufacturer, model number and even cost estimates wherever you can.

    Supplies and Materials. Itemize the expendable supplies you will need for your project.

    Travel. Include the cost of trips necessary to collect data, of consultants' travel, and of trips to present the results of research conducted under this particular grant at professional meetings. Grant-supported travel is subject to all of the policies and procedures imposed by the University when its own funds are being used.

    Publication Costs. Specify the cost of preparing and publishing project reports, as well as journal page charges if appropriate.

    Communications. Include any telephone and postage expenses related to your project that would exceed those you might incur in the course of your normal duties as a faculty member.

    Subcontracts. If your project will require the services of a non-University of Detroit Mercy organization, including those of faculty or staff at another university, include those expenses as a subcontract in the budget. Where such subcontracts will be involved, you would be well advised to consult the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration and the Controller's Office well in advance of the deadline for submitting the grant proposal.

    Indirect Costs. In addition to the many costs that are directly related to your project, the University will inevitably incur certain expenses that relate only indirectly to your project and yet will be integral to its success. These include the provision of building space and utilities, and such services as Security and Safety, Purchasing, Physical Plant and even the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration and Controller's Office themselves.

    These indirect costs are part of your project expenses and need to be included in its budget. The federal government allows the University to recover indirect costs at a predetermined, negotiated rate which reflects the actual amounts spent by the University in support of funded research in prior years (see the UDM Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet for the current Indirect Cost Rate).

    Cost Sharing. Depending both on the nature of your project and on special requirements of the funding organization, you may request all project costs from the organization, or request that the University share a percentage of those costs. If cost sharing is either required or desirable, the University prefers to contribute personnel time or to forego a portion of the indirect costs to which it is entitled. If other sources of cost sharing are needed, these will need to be discussed with your department chairperson, your college dean and OSPRA staff well in advance of the time you plan to submit the proposal. In general the University does not support proposals which contain a high percentage of cost sharing.

    The (entirely fictional) budget presented on the budget sheet from the University's Internal Summary Form for Proposal Review and Approval illustrates how an itemized proposal budget might look.

  • Budget Justification

    A budget justification immediately following the proposal budget explains in narrative form the need for any unusual or expensive budget items and the basis for calculating any figures that are not self-explanatory.

  • Appendices

    You may want to attach material that is related to, but not directly a part of, your proposal. Such information might include lengthy tables and charts, survey instruments, journal reprints, or letters of support from collaborators. Such materials should be contained in appendices and listed separately in the table of contents.

  • Special Considerations

    We have tried to describe briefly the most common steps involved in developing a grant proposal. However, your particular proposal, which describes a specific research project and is directed to a particular funding agency, may involve special considerations, In particular, if your project involves human subjects, live vertebrate animals, radioactive substances, or biohazards, it will automatically be subject to review by one of the University's oversight committees (see the UDM Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet for a list of contact people for these oversight committees). Such reviews demand extra allocations of time but cannot be circumvented and will, in any case, be required by the funding agency. The University Policies and Procedures regarding these oversight committees duties, and yours, can be obtained at the following web site - http://www.udmercy.edu/academicaffairs/ospra/policies/

Submitting Proposals

In most cases, even though you prepare the research proposal and will direct the work if it is funded, it is the University which, as a corporate entity, formally submits the proposal and accepts responsibility for whatever funds you may be awarded. Before it assumes that role, the University naturally wishes to ensure the proposal's completeness in every respect--legal, fiscal and academic.University of Detroit Mercy thus requires that all requests for external funding be approved by several University offices before they are submitted, and provides, through the Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration, an Internal Summary Form which includes a Sign-Off section for that purpose.Signatures on this sheet (a copy of which appears in an appendix to this Guide) include among others those of:
Your Department Chairperson/Director, who guarantees the academic cogency of the proposal and the availability of adequate space and other resources for completing the project;
The Dean of your College or School, who reviews similar questions from a broader perspective and also signifies his or her agreement to the proposed allocation of faculty time to the project if it is funded;
The Grants Administrator (who ideally should be familiar with your budget from an earlier stage in its development), who signifies that the proposal budget is consistent with University policy;
The Director of Sponsored Research Administration who reviews the entire proposal and all required certifications to insure that the proposal meets all University and funding agency requirements; and lastly
The Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost who acts formally on behalf of the University to authorize submission of the proposal.
It is important to recognize that routing a proposal in this way may take at least seven working days; where the approval of one of the University oversight committees is called for, or where agency or foundation guidelines stipulate additional signatures, it may take even longer. You can, however, significantly reduce the time needed by working consistently with all those involved during the entire process of developing the proposal and by circulating drafts to those whose signature you will ultimately be seeking.Only after the University of Detroit Mercy Internal Summary Form and (in almost all cases) the original copy of the proposal itself have been signed by the Vice President for Academic Affairs and Provost may you mail or deliver it (with the requisite number of copies) to the funding source you selected. Remember always to ensure that you allow plenty of time to meet the deadline the agency stipulates; remember that mail deliveries are not always as prompt as one might wish. Keep copies of all documentation, including records of mailing and delivery, just in case your materials should go astray.The OSPRA will monitor the progress of your proposal wherever possible, but very often agencies fail to "copy us in" when they inform you of the success or failure of your application. We, therefore, welcome hearing any news -- good or bad -- as it becomes available to you.Naturally, the Grants Administrator in the Controller's Office will be ready to assist you in administering your project if your hard efforts are rewarded with a grant or a contract. The details of that process, however, lie beyond the scope of this Guide.Should you receive a rejection letter, we urge you not to take it as a direct criticism of the project itself. Even a federal agency takes many factors into account besides the intrinsic merit of the proposed study: the geographical distribution of its funds, for example, or specific agency priorities. The OSPRA will be happy to work with you to discover whatever we can about the reasons for your failure to secure funding and to assess the chances for a successful resubmission to that source or to some other agency.While some of the steps outlined on this and the preceding pages may sound formidable, our experience suggests that the effort is usually rewarding. The process of applying for funding is itself instructional; invariably results in a substantial critique of your work by your peers; and is explicitly valued by the University of Detroit Mercy's department chairpersons, by its deans and by the University Tenure and Promotion Committee in making personnel decisions. The Office for Sponsored Projects and Research Administration, and the Grants Administrator in the Controller's Office are eager to do whatever they can to reduce the burden of the merely mechanical steps in the process and we look forward to working with you in the months and years ahead.

ATTACHMENTS

  1. Detailed Budget Information and Procedures
  2. Copyright Policy
  3. Conflict of Interest Policy
  4. Disclosure of Invention
  5. Faculty Grant Incentive Policy
  6. Human Subjects Research and IRB Forms
  7. Military Research at the University of Detroit Mercy
  8. Patent Policy
  9. Principle Investigator Status Policy
  10. Scientific/Scholarly Misconduct
  11. Sponsored Projects and Research Fact Sheet
  12. Sponsored Research Registration Information
  13. University of Detroit Mercy Internal Summary Form (.pdf)